SEC Launches Public Review for Novel ETFs, Including Crypto and Prediction Markets

The SEC is collaborating with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to navigate the rapidly expanding market for prediction-market-backed ETFs, signaling increased interagency coordination on these assets.
SEC data cited by Brian Daly show ETF assets rising from about $4 trillion in 2019 to more than $12 trillion by the end of 2025, underscoring the scale of growth that regulatory clarity aims to support.
The SEC has previously declined to authorize some leveraged or event-driven ETFs, including proposals with triple to quintuple returns and those tied to real-world outcomes such as elections, illustrating ongoing regulatory caution toward novelty.
Industry analysis has framed the development as part of a broader effort to define ETF recognition criteria and reduce indiscriminate filings, aiming to streamline approvals while preserving investor protections.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission launched a 60-day public comment period on June 30, 2026, to reshape rules for "novel" exchange-traded funds — a fast-growing category that includes products tied to prediction markets, cryptocurrency themes, and event-driven outcomes like elections. The move follows a surge of more than 24 pending ETF applications from firms like Roundhill, Bitwise, and GraniteShares, all currently on hold, according to Crypto Briefing.
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the goal is a "consistent, transparent, and efficient regulatory framework" as the ETF market has exploded from $4 trillion in 2019 to more than $12 trillion by the end of 2025, per SEC Division of Investment Management data cited by Brian Daly, the agency's investment management director.
The flood began in February 2026. Issuers filed more than two dozen ETF applications designed to track "event contracts" — bets on outcomes like the 2026 midterms or the 2028 presidential race. In May, Chairman Atkins directed staff to pause the automatic approval clock on these funds to assess jurisdictional risks and market integrity concerns, according to Crypto Briefing.
Analysts warn these products carry what Finance Feeds calls "binary risk." If an event goes against a fund's position — say, a candidate loses — the fund's value could collapse to near zero almost instantly. That makes them behave more like options contracts than traditional diversified ETFs.
A core legal problem is that event contracts are not securities — they're closer to futures or commodities. That puts the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the picture. On June 26, 2026, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint request for comment on harmonizing rules to reduce market fragmentation, according to The Globe and Mail. CFTC Chairman Mike Selig said closer cooperation "promises to unleash untapped capital."
The CFTC also released a proposed rule in June asking which event contracts are "contrary to the public interest." Some contracts — those tied to war or terrorism — are expected to remain permanently banned, according to Seeking Alpha.
The SEC's 2019 "ETF Rule" — known as Rule 6c-11 — let standard stock-and-bond ETFs reach the market without individual case-by-case approval. But that rule was not built for funds investing mostly in event contracts. The SEC is now asking whether new conditions, like minimum securities holdings, should apply, according to Yahoo Finance.
Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said the SEC wants to stop "indiscriminate" filings where dozens of firms race to copy a novel idea the moment it goes public, as cited by Head Topics. The agency is even exploring confidential filings during a 75-day review window to protect original ideas from being immediately cloned.
If these ETFs get approved, ordinary investors could gain direct exposure to political and economic outcomes right inside their brokerage accounts. Prediction markets currently handle about $7 billion in weekly volume, according to Finance Feeds. Packaging that into an ETF wrapper would bring reporting, custody, and transparency that offshore platforms lack.
But not everyone is convinced. Smaller ETF issuers worry that complex new approval criteria will favor large firms with deep legal teams, effectively locking out smaller innovators, Dev Discourse reported. The public has 60 days from the comment period's opening to weigh in before the SEC decides its next step.
Publishers
19
Articles
74
Reach
93