Polymarket Faces Insider Trading Scrutiny Over Suspicious Activity Across 152 High-Profit Wallets

ACDC notes that Polymarket's international platform settles trades on-chain, making every wager publicly visible while wallet owners remain pseudonymous, highlighting the transparency and potential for real-time pattern detection.
Of the 556 wallets labeled 'Orcas,' 152 generated about $8 million in profits with an average win rate of 97.2%, with a concentration of activity in military and defense markets.
Haaretz reported a trader known as '25xp' allegedly made about $200,000 predicting the U.S.-Iran ceasefire and placed additional bets on Netanyahu remaining prime minister, suggesting some wagers may be aimed at influencing market odds in addition to profit.
A Stanford University and Singapore Management University study found concerns about manipulation of Polymarket's five-minute Bitcoin binary contracts, with traders potentially buying Bitcoin on Binance in the final seconds to push settlements higher.
Global regulatory scrutiny is rising, including a South Korea block on Polymarket access announced Aug. 18 by a Korea Communications Standards Commission subcommittee, reflecting broader efforts to tighten oversight of prediction markets.
Over 150 anonymous wallets on Polymarket have generated about $8 million in profits with a suspicious 97.2% win rate, primarily by betting on U.S. military and defense outcomes, according to research by the Anti-Corruption Data Collective (ACDC) ACDC Report. The 152 wallets—labeled "Orcas" by researchers—followed a striking pattern: they opened accounts, placed long-shot bets on low-probability events, and cashed out after wins. The findings raise urgent questions about whether nonpublic government information is leaking into one of the world's largest prediction markets.
Polymarket settles all trades on the blockchain, making every wager publicly visible while trader identities stay hidden. This transparency cuts both ways: it exposes potential insider trading in real time, but also broadcasts winning signals to bots, whales, and possibly foreign intelligence services IBTimes. Neither Polymarket nor the Department of Defense has publicly responded to the research.
ACDC analyzed nearly 78,500 high-risk, low-probability bets across Polymarket and flagged 556 wallets showing insider-trading hallmarks Inshorts. Of those, 152 wallets delivered extraordinary returns. The average win rate of 97.2% far exceeds what luck alone could explain. Most suspicious: the concentration in military and defense markets, where information would typically remain classified.
A trader using the handle "25xp" exemplifies the pattern. Haaretz reported the account made roughly $200,000 predicting a U.S.-Iran ceasefire, then placed additional bets on Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu staying in office. Such precision suggests access to nonpublic intelligence rather than lucky guesses.
Because Polymarket operates entirely on-chain, every trade is recorded publicly and instantly. Researchers warn that large traders and automated bots can copy winning bets in real time Finance Magnates. If insider traders are visible, so are their profits. Foreign governments monitoring the platform could use these signals to infer classified information or time market movements for geopolitical advantage.
This visibility also enables copycat trades. When a profitable bet settles, bots can detect the pattern and replicate it before prices adjust. The Orca wallets' extreme success rate suggests they had an informational edge—not an edge they kept secret for long once trades went live.
Polymarket's vulnerability to manipulation extends beyond military secrets. Researchers from Stanford University and Singapore Management University uncovered a concerning pattern in the platform's five-minute Bitcoin binary contracts Journal Record. Traders were allegedly buying Bitcoin on Binance in the final seconds before settlement to artificially push prices higher and win their bets.
This strategy works because Bitcoin's price on Binance can shift rapidly, and Polymarket's short settlement windows create exploitable gaps. The study suggests that prediction markets—not just Polymarket—may be vulnerable to last-minute price manipulation by coordinated traders with access to large capital.
Regulatory scrutiny of Polymarket is intensifying worldwide. On August 18, South Korea's Communications Standards Commission subcommittee announced a block on Polymarket access IBTimes, citing concerns about market integrity and consumer protection. The move reflects broader government efforts to control prediction markets and limit exposure to potential manipulation.
ACDC acknowledges that its findings do not prove illegal activity occurred. The observed patterns could reflect luck, superior analysis, or other explanations. But the organization argues that the data warrants serious investigation by law enforcement and financial regulators. Without oversight, prediction markets risk becoming tools for intelligence leaks and market rigging.
Publishers
13
Articles
88
Reach
101