Federal Judge Dismisses DOJ Bid for Kentucky Voter Data, Citing Legal Flaws
The Kentucky case was dismissed with prejudice, preventing the DOJ from refiling the same challenge to obtain voter rolls and related data.
Several of the DOJ letters to Kentucky officials failed to specify a legal basis or cited the wrong laws, undermining the request's legitimacy.
The court adopted the Sixth Circuit Michigan ruling that a state's own self-generated voter list is not a 'record that comes into' election officials' possession under the Civil Rights Act, limiting federal access to such data.
Nationwide, the DOJ has filed roughly 30 state-voter data lawsuits with about 17 dismissed, underscoring a broader losing streak in these efforts.
Emails and records show the Trump administration pressed Kentucky officials to turn over voter rolls, while DOJs actions elsewhere have included sharing voter-roll data with the DHS to identify noncitizens.
A federal judge in Kentucky has dismissed the Department of Justice's lawsuit seeking unredacted voter roll data from the state, marking the DOJ's 17th straight loss in these efforts nationwide, according to Democracy Docket. Judge Boom threw out the case with prejudice, meaning the DOJ cannot refile the same challenge.
The ruling is part of a broader losing streak for the Trump administration. The DOJ has filed roughly 30 state voter data lawsuits. About 17 have now been dismissed, Democracy Docket reports. Despite those losses, the DOJ is appealing defeats in eight federal appeals courts.
The DOJ sued Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams and the State Board of Elections after they refused to share voter data, WLKY reported. The DOJ wanted unredacted records including dates of birth, driver's license numbers, and Social Security numbers. Kentucky officials argued those records are protected and the federal request went too far.
The Sun Herald reported that some DOJ letters to Kentucky officials failed to name a legal basis for the request. Others cited the wrong laws entirely. That undermined the DOJ's case before it even reached the court.
Judge Boom agreed with a key legal argument used to block the DOJ in Michigan. The Sixth Circuit Court ruled that a state's own voter list does not 'come into' the possession of election officials under the Civil Rights Act. It is self-generated data, not a record received from outside. Kentucky falls under the Sixth Circuit, so that ruling applied directly here.
That legal distinction is now doing heavy damage to the DOJ's nationwide push. Democracy Docket notes the DOJ has lost every single district court case so far. The dismissal with prejudice in Kentucky means the DOJ gets no second chance in that court.
Internal emails and records show the Trump administration pressed Kentucky officials directly to hand over voter rolls, according to Fox 56 News. The pressure campaign was not just legal — it was political. Civil liberties groups and voter advocates stepped in as intervenors to help block the data transfer.
The stakes go beyond Kentucky. Democracy Docket reported that in other states, the DOJ shared voter roll data with the Department of Homeland Security to identify noncitizens. Privacy advocates say that use of voter data raises serious concerns about how the information could be weaponized.
Rather than stop after 17 losses, the DOJ is pushing forward. Democracy Docket reported the administration has now appealed into eight different federal appeals circuits. That means the legal fight is expanding even as the DOJ keeps losing at the district court level.
Secretary of State Adams framed the Kentucky dismissal as a win for voters. The ruling leaves state privacy protections in place for now. But with appeals still active across the country, the battle over federal access to state voter data is far from over, KDH News noted.
Publishers
11
Articles
16
Reach
27