Ohio Lawmakers Fail to Pass Data Center Regulation Bill Due to Tax Break Dispute

Ohio's effort to rein in its booming data center industry collapsed on June 10, 2026, when House Speaker Matt Huffman pulled a scheduled floor vote on House Bill 646. The bill was meant to reduce sales tax breaks for future data centers — but a faction of Republican lawmakers wants to eliminate the breaks entirely, not just cut them in half. Columbus Dispatch reported the Senate also declined to move forward.
Ohio has given up an estimated $1.2 billion in sales tax revenue over the past three fiscal years by exempting data centers from paying taxes on equipment and electricity, according to the Ohio Legislative Service Commission. The state now hosts over 200 facilities, and the political will to keep subsidizing them is fracturing.
Ohio passed a 100% sales tax exemption for data centers back in 2011 to lure tech companies away from Virginia and Maryland. It worked. Amazon, Google, and Meta all built major facilities in the Columbus and New Albany corridors. By 2025, Ohio counted 204 operational or permitted data centers across 14 counties. The "Silicon Heartland" was born.
But the math stopped adding up. Data centers employ an average of just one permanent worker per 25,000 square feet — compared to one per 500 square feet in traditional manufacturing. Meanwhile, the tax exemptions kept draining state coffers. The Legislative Service Commission put the three-year revenue loss at $1.2 billion. That number lit a fuse inside the Republican caucus.
House Bill 646, introduced by Rep. Brian Lorenz (R-Powell), tried to split the difference. Future data center projects would receive a 50% sales tax exemption — down from the current near-100% break — while existing facilities would keep their deals. The bill also required data centers to pay for their own electricity infrastructure and to track water usage.
The tech industry pushed back hard. The TechOhio Alliance, a lobbying group representing Amazon Web Services, Meta, and Google, warned that reducing incentives would freeze $15 billion in planned expansions. "Ohio has positioned itself as the Silicon Heartland," the group said in a press release. "Changing the rules of the game mid-stream sends a message of instability to global investors."
The bigger threat to the bill came from inside the Republican Party. A "Fiscal Hawk" faction, led by Rep. Derek Merrin, argued that a 50% exemption was still a giveaway to trillion-dollar corporations. Speaker Huffman acknowledged the divide bluntly on June 10. "There is a strong contingent of representatives who look at the billions in lost revenue and say, 'Why are we giving any exemption at all?'" he said. "We aren't going to pass a half-measure."
The standoff left the bill in limbo. At least three major projects in Licking and Delaware counties are reportedly on hold, representing roughly $4.2 billion in capital investment, according to Crain's Cleveland Business. Political analyst Dr. Elena Rossi of the Ohio Center for Policy summed it up: "Investors hate uncertainty more than they hate taxes. By failing to vote, Ohio has signaled that the incentive climate is volatile."
Without HB 646, key consumer protections die with it. The bill would have forced data centers to fund their own dedicated power infrastructure. The PJM Interconnection — the regional grid operator — warned in late 2025 that surging data center demand was threatening grid stability. Ohio's Public Utilities Commission says residential customers could face electricity surcharges of 10% to 15% if data centers don't start paying for grid upgrades themselves.
Water is another pressure point. Each facility uses an estimated 2.5 million gallons per day for cooling, per EPA estimates. The Sierra Club's Ohio director Kristy Meyer criticized the delay. "Every day this bill stalls is another day data centers can draw millions of gallons of groundwater with zero transparency," she said. Lawmakers have set no new timeline for a vote.
Publishers
9
Articles
9
Reach
9