Apple Antitrust Dismissal

Judge Allowed Case to Move Forward Last Year

In November 2025, federal Judge Mark Pittman denied Apple and OpenAI's motions to dismiss the lawsuit. This decision let the antitrust claims proceed past the initial legal challenge. Ledger-Enquirer reported that discovery disputes then persisted through the first half of 2026, slowing the case's momentum before the Apple claims were dropped.

1 source

Apple's Integration of ChatGPT Into Siri Was Central Complaint

The lawsuit alleged that Apple's system-level integration of ChatGPT into Apple Intelligence and Siri disadvantaged rival AI assistants. Musk's companies claimed this exclusive treatment violated antitrust law and harmed Grok's market position. The complaint focused on how Apple controls iPhone user access and can prioritize which AI assistants get prominent placement.

However, evidence disputed the exclusivity claim. Ledger-Enquirer noted that rival chatbots DeepSeek and Perplexity reached the top of the App Store charts after Apple's ChatGPT partnership began. Grok, however, did not achieve similar ranking success despite the lawsuit's allegations of app suppression.

1 source

Evidence Disputes and Missing Documents Plagued the Case

Musk's companies faced allegations that they withheld or destroyed evidence during discovery. In May 2026, Apple's senior vice president of software engineering Craig Federighi was designated a document custodian. Ledger-Enquirer reported that a separate request to designate CEO Tim Cook as a custodian was denied by the court.

These discovery fights created months of delays. The contested document exchanges pushed the case into mid-2026 before the Apple dismissal. OpenAI has characterized the lawsuit as harassment, citing a pattern of litigation by Musk, who pursued a related case that a jury rejected in May after finding he waited too long to file.

1 source

OpenAI Battle Continues Over Chatbot Monopoly Claims

While Apple's antitrust claims were dropped, the lawsuit against OpenAI proceeds. The remaining allegations assert that OpenAI used anticompetitive conduct to dominate chatbot distribution and reinforced an illegal market monopoly through its Apple partnership. Macon noted that both OpenAI and Apple deny wrongdoing and maintain that integration decisions followed normal business practices.

The outcome could reshape how AI providers and device makers approach partnerships. A victory for Musk's companies might restrict exclusive integrations and preferred system-level access. A win for OpenAI would preserve hardware companies' freedom to select strategic AI partners without major antitrust constraints.

1 source