Tesla and NatPower Forge Multiyear Partnership for 25 GWh European Energy Storage

Tesla's stock market reaction to the NatPower deal included a June 22 close of $405.05 with a roughly $1.52 trillion market cap, followed by a pre-market price around $390.69 on June 23, down about 3.55%.
NatPower is described as an independent energy infrastructure developer, underscoring its role outside traditional utilities in pursuing continent-scale storage portfolios.
Coverage highlights that large-scale storage projects aim to balance intermittent renewables and reduce curtailment, in addition to boosting grid reliability—an important rationales for Europe’s storage push.
NatPower and Tesla announced a multiyear deal to deploy 25 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of battery storage across Italy and the UK — the first phase of a plan to build more than 100 GWh total. The project spans five sites and will use Tesla's Megapack batteries alongside its energy trading software. The total cost runs between $4 billion and $5 billion, according to Yahoo Finance, with projected revenue topping $15 billion over 20 years.
NatPower CEO Fabrizio Zago said the industry already has what it needs to succeed. "The industry has the technology and the capital, but we often struggle with execution at speed," he said. "By collaborating with Tesla, we aren't just buying batteries — we are creating an integrated ecosystem that can be replicated across any market in the world."
The first phase covers five large-scale projects split between Italy and the United Kingdom. NatPower handled the hard groundwork — securing land, permits, and grid connections — years in advance. Tesla supplies the hardware and software. The hardware is the Megapack 2XL battery unit. The software, called Autobidder, uses artificial intelligence to decide the best times to buy and sell electricity, according to Trading Pedia.
The partnership is designed to scale fast. Phase one targets 25 GWh. The full buildout aims for more than 100 GWh. For context, Tesla's famous 2017 battery project in South Australia held just 0.129 GWh. This deal is roughly 200 times that size. It signals, as IndexBox noted, that battery storage has moved from the pilot stage into full infrastructure rollout.
Italy and the UK have both retired coal plants and cut back on gas. Wind and solar now make up a bigger share of their power mix. But when the wind blows hard or the sun shines bright, grids can produce more electricity than people use. Without storage, operators must "curtail" — or simply switch off — those clean energy sources to prevent overload, wasting power that could have been saved.
Italy recently introduced a new regulatory program called MACSE, which gives storage projects long-term contracts and steady revenue. The UK has faced years of delays in connecting new energy projects to the grid. NatPower moved early, locking up sites before competition for grid slots intensified. Both countries' grid operators — Terna in Italy and National Grid in the UK — will work to integrate the new battery projects, according to Crypto Briefing.
The $15 billion revenue forecast over 20 years comes from stacking three types of income. First, "frequency response" — getting paid to stabilize the grid in milliseconds. Second, "capacity market payments" — being paid to be available during peak demand. Third, energy arbitrage — charging batteries when electricity is cheap (often overnight) and selling it back when prices spike. Tesla's Autobidder software automates all three strategies around the clock.
Some analysts have raised caution. The Financial Times and Bloomberg have noted that lithium-ion batteries degrade over time. Operations and maintenance costs over two decades could eat into margins. Friends of the Earth has also raised concerns about sourcing the lithium needed for 100 GWh of batteries. Still, the basic math — $4 to $5 billion spent, $15 billion returned — is seen as a bankable model by most energy investors, per Head Topics.
Tesla's stock closed at $405.05 on June 22 — the day the deal was announced — giving the company a market cap of roughly $1.52 trillion. By June 23, pre-market trading showed shares down to $390.69, a drop of about 3.55%. That 3.55% swing represents a roughly $50 billion shift in Tesla's market value — ten times the entire cost of the NatPower project itself.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley called the dip a "technical correction," saying the market is pricing in the risk of executing a $5 billion hardware rollout on schedule. Others noted Tesla's stock had already climbed in the days before the announcement. Wood Mackenzie analysts pointed out that the deal effectively locks Tesla's supply chain into the European market for at least three years — a significant strategic win, even if Wall Street took a day to warm up to it, according to Crypto Briefing.
Publishers
18
Articles
52
Reach
70