California Judge Extends Restraining Order, Delaying Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Amid Antitrust Scrutiny

Paramount warned that a prolonged delay could cost the company more than $1 billion, underscoring the high financial risk if the closing is stalled.
A coalition of about a dozen state attorneys general, led by California, filed the antitrust suit arguing the merger would lessen competition in film and television and could harm theatres and cable distributors.
The Writers Guild of America has its own separate legal challenge to the deal and is expected to participate in the scheduled August 3 hearing.
U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín extended the temporary restraining order to August 17; the original order would have expired on August 3, and the extension reflects ongoing scheduling and hearing logistics.
A California federal judge has extended a temporary restraining order blocking the $111 billion merger of Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery until at least August 17, according to The New York Times. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín issued the extension to allow time for scheduling, hearings, and further legal arguments before any final ruling.
The original order was set to expire August 3. The extension buys the court more time to weigh two separate lawsuits — one from a coalition of state attorneys general, another from the Writers Guild of America — both seeking to permanently block the deal, Media Play News reported.
About a dozen state attorneys general, led by California, filed an antitrust lawsuit against the deal. They argue the merger would reduce competition across film, television, and distribution. Their concern extends to movie theatres and cable distributors, which they say could be harmed if the combined company gains too much power over content, Yahoo Finance reported.
The deal would combine two of Hollywood's biggest studios under one roof. Critics say that kind of consolidation gives the new company outsized control over what gets made, where it airs, and how much distributors pay for it.
The Writers Guild of America has filed its own legal challenge against the merger. The WGA's case is separate from the state attorneys general lawsuit. Both sides are expected to participate in a hearing scheduled for August 3, before the extended restraining order expires on August 17, according to The New York Times.
Paramount has asked for a three-day evidentiary hearing to present its case. The two sides are still working out the format and timeline for that hearing. Judge Martínez-Olguín ordered all parties to meet and submit a joint report by July 24, WDC News 6 reported.
Paramount has made clear the financial stakes are enormous. The company warned that a prolonged court delay could cost it more than $1 billion. That figure reflects the risk of a deal stalling at the finish line — a scenario that becomes more likely with each court extension, Media Play News reported.
The deal has already cleared other regulatory hurdles. But the court battle in California has introduced real uncertainty about when — or whether — the merger can close.
The August 3 hearing will be a key moment. The court will weigh arguments on whether to issue a preliminary injunction — a longer-term block that would put the merger on hold indefinitely. If the judge grants one, the deal could be tied up in court for months, Mezha reported.
The parties must submit their joint scheduling report by July 24. After that, the court will decide the format for Paramount's requested three-day hearing. The August 17 deadline on the restraining order means a ruling on the injunction must come quickly.
Publishers
17
Articles
94
Reach
111