Iranian Lawmaker Proposes Capturing 100 U.S. Personnel, Escalating Gulf Tensions

Mottaki explicitly proposed invading a U.S. base in the region to capture about 100 Americans and bring them to Iran, describing it as a hostage-taking operation.
Mottaki warned that in the event of a U.S. ground operation, Iran could respond by attacking U.S. military bases in the Persian Gulf, potentially including a combined helicopter-borne and ground assault on targets such as Kharg Island.
A broader network of Iranian officials and commentators aligned with hard-line perspectives have publicly discussed capturing American troops or retaliatory acts as leverage, with figures like Ali Larijani, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, and Gholamreza Mesbahi-Moghadam signaling readiness to confront U.S. moves.
Iranian officials framed security-for-fees logic around the Strait of Hormuz, with Abbas Araghchi arguing that those ensuring safe passage should be compensated, while acknowledging limits by saying 'Twenty percent is, of course, too much. We will be fair.'
Trump quickly abandoned the 20% transit-fee proposal after consultations with regional leaders, but Iranian officials and commentators used the episode to defend or critique Tehran's long-standing position on transit charges and international-law implications.
An Iranian lawmaker and former foreign minister has publicly proposed a ground assault on a U.S. military base in the Persian Gulf to capture roughly 100 American troops and bring them to Iran. Manouchehr Mottaki laid out the plan as a potential hostage-taking operation, marking one of the most explicit escalatory threats by a senior Iranian official in recent memory. IBTimes UK reported that Tehran simultaneously unveiled a mural showing President Trump in a coffin, underscoring the sharpness of Iran's current rhetoric.
The threats come as U.S. airstrikes against Iran continue and President Trump pushes for a negotiated settlement. Trump has insisted that Iran "want to settle," according to News.com.au, even as hard-liners in Tehran publicly discuss retaliatory military options.
Mottaki did not speak in vague terms. He proposed a specific operation: a combined helicopter and ground assault targeting a U.S. base in the Persian Gulf region. The goal, he said, would be to seize around 100 American personnel and transport them to Iran. He framed this as leverage against Washington. He also warned that if the U.S. launches a ground operation, Iran could strike U.S. military bases across the Gulf, with targets potentially including the strategically vital Kharg Island.
Mottaki also claimed that past U.S. agreements were deceptive. His remarks fit a wider pattern. Senior figures including Ali Larijani, parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, and cleric Gholamreza Mesbahi-Moghadam have all publicly aligned with hard-line positions. Together, they signal that Iran's leadership is at least debating serious military escalation, not just issuing empty warnings.
At the same time, a separate dispute over the Strait of Hormuz added fuel to the fire. Trump floated a 20% transit fee for ships passing through the strait. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded with a notable mix of openness and pushback. He argued that countries securing safe passage through the strait deserve compensation. But he added: "Twenty percent is, of course, too much. We will be fair."
Trump quickly dropped the 20% proposal after talks with regional leaders, according to The Courier Mail. But the episode gave Iranian officials an opening. Hard-liners used it to defend Tehran's long-standing claim that it has a legitimate stake in Hormuz transit. Critics warned that any such fee scheme could violate international maritime law and further destabilize global shipping routes.
Despite the fiery rhetoric from Tehran, Trump has maintained that Iran is looking for a way out. "Iran want to settle," he said publicly, even as American airstrikes continued. The disconnect between Washington's optimism and Tehran's threats has left regional allies on edge. Gulf states hosting U.S. bases are caught in the middle, aware that they could become targets if the situation escalates further.
Iran's mural campaign adds a symbolic layer to the crisis. IBTimes UK reported that the artwork showing Trump in a coffin, labeled "Let's kill Trump," was placed on a building facing Enghelab Square in central Tehran. The U.S. has treated Iranian revenge plots as credible threats. The combination of public murals, explicit military proposals, and ongoing airstrikes points to a Gulf security environment that is deteriorating fast.
Publishers
16
Articles
40
Reach
56