Eminem Loses Australian Trademark Rights for Shady Clothing to Swim Shady

The registrar explicitly noted that the extent of use of signs containing the word 'Shady' in relation to the Registered Goods is relatively low, with Slim Shady being more recognisable as Eminem's performer persona than a standalone merchandise mark.
Evidence presented showed only three Australian merchandise sales occurred in the relevant period, suggesting limited direct use of the marks on goods in Australia.
The decision noted that merchandise sales appeared to be handled by Eminem's record label rather than by the artist personally, casting doubt on direct control over the use of the marks in Australia.
Registrar Benjamin Goldsworthy delivered the ruling on July 1, 2026, with Eminem’s team given a deadline to appeal by July 22, and the ruling also narrows protection for 'Shady' and 'Shady Limited' to non-clothing goods from August 1.
Swim Shady’s product lineup in Australia includes beach-related goods such as umbrellas, towels, shorts and bags, illustrating the scope of the brand’s merchandise that remains under protection.
An Australian beach brand has beaten Eminem in a trademark fight, stripping the rapper of key protections in the country. Registrar Benjamin Goldsworthy ruled on July 1, 2026, that Eminem's 'Shady' and 'Shady Limited' marks no longer cover clothing, footwear, headgear, bags, or leather goods in Australia, according to Digital Music News. The change takes effect August 1.
Sydney-based Swim Shady, which sells beach goods like umbrellas, towels, shorts, and bags, brought the challenge. Eminem's team has until July 22 to appeal, and was also ordered to pay Swim Shady's legal costs, AllHipHop reported.
The ruling hinged on a simple problem: Eminem barely used the marks on goods in Australia. Evidence showed only three merchandise sales in the relevant period, according to Digital Music News. That was not enough to keep full trademark protection.
Registrar Goldsworthy noted that use of the word 'Shady' on registered goods was 'relatively low.' He also found that 'Slim Shady' was better known as a performer name than a standalone merchandise brand. Most of the branding tied to music, not clothing or accessories, UNILAD reported.
The decision also raised a key question: did Eminem personally control how his marks were used in Australia? The registrar found that merchandise sales were handled by his record label, not the artist himself. That separation weakened his claim, according to Music News.
Under trademark law, an owner must show real, direct use of a mark — or control over who uses it. With sales run through the label and almost none reaching Australian customers, Eminem's team could not make that case stick.
Co-founders Jeremy Scott and Elizabeth Afrakoff welcomed the result. They called it a milestone for their brand. But they were careful to note that more steps remain in the broader trademark proceedings, Digital Music News reported.
Swim Shady's product range — beach umbrellas, towels, shorts, and bags — stays fully protected. The brand can keep using its name on all those goods. Eminem's marks survive in other areas, including music and electronics, but the clothing and accessories fight is largely over in Australia.
The case has drawn attention far beyond Australia. Trademark experts are watching closely because the outcome could shape how celebrity brands protect their names on merchandise worldwide. Eminem's team has until July 22 to file an appeal, Yahoo News reported.
Further category reviews are still possible. If Eminem does not appeal, the narrowed protections lock in on August 1. Either way, the ruling sets a clear signal: owning a famous name is not enough. You must actually use it on the goods you want to protect.
Publishers
13
Articles
34
Reach
47