Green Bay Packers Confront Wisconsin Congressman Over Proposed Broadcasting Law Changes

The Green Bay Packers are publicly attacking Republican U.S. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, who is leading a House Judiciary subcommittee investigating possible changes to the Sports Broadcasting Act. Post-Crescent reported that the team issued an official call to action, urging shareholders and fans to push back against the effort. The dispute centers on whether the federal government should rewrite the broadcast rules that have governed NFL games on TV for decades.
At the heart of the fight is a system called Designated Market Areas, or DMAs. These are geographic zones that determine which local TV stations carry which NFL games. Roughly 13 Wisconsin counties fall inside the Minneapolis-St. Paul TV market — meaning those residents often watch Vikings games instead of Packers games, even though they live in Wisconsin.
About 415,000 Wisconsin residents live in counties assigned to the Minneapolis-St. Paul TV market under the DMA system. When the Vikings and Packers play at the same time, those fans are forced to watch Minnesota's team on their local FOX affiliate. Counties like Douglas, St. Croix, and Pierce are among those affected. Fans in those areas often have to pay for NFL Sunday Ticket or use other workarounds just to watch Green Bay.
Rep. Fitzgerald's subcommittee is exploring changes to the Sports Broadcasting Act, a law dating back to the 1960s. Supporters of reform argue it is a basic fairness issue. "It is a basic right for Wisconsinites to watch their home team," said the congressman leading the effort. "The NFL and the Packers shouldn't be allowed to use 1950s-era map logic to force our citizens to watch the Vikings."
The Packers are not just annoyed — they say the bill could end free NFL football as fans know it. Packers President and CEO Mark Murphy wrote in an open column that the legislation "would have the unintended consequence of moving more games to pay-per-view or streaming services." He argued that nearly 100% of Packers games are currently on free, over-the-air TV — a rarity in pro sports — and the bill puts that at risk.
The NFL backs the Packers on this. The league holds an $110 billion, 11-year deal with broadcast partners like FOX, CBS, and NBC. Those networks pay for exclusive rights to specific markets. If Congress forces the DMA system open, experts say the networks could pay less — and the NFL could shift more games to Amazon, Netflix, or Apple TV to make up the money. That would mean fans pay to watch games they currently get for free.
The Packers rarely wade into politics. The team is community-owned — the only one of its kind in the NFL — which makes their public attack on a Wisconsin congressman especially striking. The organization issued a formal call to action to its shareholders, asking them to contact their representatives and oppose the bill. That kind of direct political move is almost unheard of for the franchise.
The congressman fired back, accusing the Packers of "siding with corporate billionaires over their own loyal fans." Polling from affected areas shows about 82% of residents in those 13 counties support reform. Still, taking on the Packers in Wisconsin is a steep political hill. Several of the congressman's own Republican colleagues in the state have stayed quiet, unwilling to cross the team's enormous fan base.
If the Sports Broadcasting Act is changed, Minneapolis-area TV stations could lose an estimated $15 million to $25 million per year in advertising revenue. Wisconsin-based viewers and their ad dollars would shift to Green Bay and Milwaukee broadcasts instead. That financial ripple could reshape local TV markets across the Midwest.
The Packers' biggest fear is a precedent. If Congress rewrites broadcast rules for Wisconsin fans, other states could push for the same thing — Raiders fans in northern California, Cowboys fans in New Mexico. The NFL worries that would unravel the entire DMA system and force the league to move all games into a single national streaming package to keep control of who watches what and when.
Publishers
5
Articles
4
Reach
5