SpaceX's $75 Billion IPO Bars China, Hong Kong Investors Amid US Security Regulations

As SpaceX prepares a landmark roughly $75 billion IPO that could value the company at about $1.75 trillion, multiple reports say investors based in mainland China and Hong Kong are being blocked from participating. A Reuters review found SpaceX’s IPO marketing materials and website were not accessible from those regions, with users encountering regional access errors such as an “Error 1009” screen. Separate reporting, citing people familiar with the matter, says the IPO’s lead banks instructed underwriting syndicate members to reject subscription orders from clients in the two markets, including through private banking channels. The rationale is linked to U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations, which restrict the export and transfer of defense-related technology and technical data, raising potential legal and national security concerns given SpaceX’s aerospace and defense ties. Reuters and other outlets said banks did not comment or could not verify details independently, while reporting also noted geopolitical and data-security pressures that have made U.S. tech firms more cautious about Chinese investment. If enforced as described, the exclusion would reshape the IPO’s investor base even as the offering remains positioned as a candidate for a first U.S. listing above $1 trillion.
Reuters’ review found SpaceX’s IPO roadshow materials were posted on its website and accessible in most major Asian markets, but not from mainland China or Hong Kong; SpaceX had also kicked off marketing roadshows in New York the day before the access problems were observed.
The IPO’s Asia-Pacific management roles were spelled out in the roadshow presentation, with Mizuho and Macquarie Capital in Australia listed among those managing the deal in Asia Pacific.
A separate report said the website showed a notice restricting access specifically for “internet protocol addresses” from Hong Kong and Shanghai, indicating the limitation was implemented at the IP level rather than through account-level checks.
On responses to Reuters, Citigroup—named as a lead bank—declined to comment, while other lead banks including Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley did not immediately respond to requests.
Publishers
11
Articles
36
Reach
47