AI Agents Threaten Traditional Bank Deposits as Automated Wealth Transfers Accelerate

Apollo economist Torsten Sløk warns that widespread use of AI agents to move household cash into higher-yield accounts could drain banks of low-cost deposits used to fund lending, though there is no evidence of an imminent bank run. Traditional checking and savings accounts often pay less than fintech alternatives offering roughly 3.3% to 5%, and automated transfers could intensify pressure on banks. Bank shares have weakened, with higher Treasury yields and interest-rate expectations also weighing on the sector. SharpLink CEO Joseph Chalom forecasts that AI agents could put more than $1 trillion in annual financial-services revenue up for grabs by 2030 and $4 trillion by 2035, while lower fees could save consumers $350 billion annually by 2030 and $1.4 trillion by 2035; these are projections, not established outcomes. Chalom says U.S. households forgo at least $180 billion in potential annual interest by keeping about $15 trillion in deposit accounts that may yield less than money-market funds, and argues stablecoins, tokenized assets and decentralized finance could play a role in the competition for those transactions.
Meta launched its Muse assistant on Sept. 8, describing it as able to carry out tasks for users rather than simply answer questions. Plaid said Muse can access user-authorized data from more than 12,000 U.S. financial institutions.
Apollo has a substantial stake in lending outside traditional banks: Business Insider reported that the firm runs an $849 billion credit arm, is the largest non-bank lender, and has said it aims to manage $1.2 trillion in private credit by 2029. Apollo’s press team said it had no further comment when contacted by the publication.
AI assistants are already encountering resistance from businesses: Business Insider reported that Amazon was preventing Meta’s Muse from adding items to shopping carts, saying the assistants had violated its rules.
Publishers
39
Articles
30
Reach
69