Treasury Committee Brands £200 Billion Student Loans Mis-Sold, Demands Government Action

Treasury Committee MPs say the Plan 2 repayment threshold will be frozen at £29,385 from 2027 to 2030, rather than uprated with inflation, meaning graduates will repay more over time as wages rise.
If there is compensation for mis-selling, the scale could dwarf previous UK payouts, potentially eclipsing the £50 billion PPI bill and other large settlements.
A commentator argues the mis-selling story extends far beyond the loan contract itself, noting a decades-long push to promote university education as the path to prosperity—and citing that ‘The real mis-selling happened years before the loan agreement was signed.’
The report highlights that student loans sit outside the FCA and typical consumer protections, with unclear legal responsibility between the Department for Education and the Student Loans Company, limiting borrowers’ recourse.
The UK Treasury Committee has branded around £200 billion of student loans as mis-sold, accusing successive governments of hiding key details from more than five million borrowers The Telegraph. The committee says ministers have a "moral obligation" to fix the problem — and warns that if compensation is ever paid, it could dwarf even the £50 billion PPI scandal.
At the heart of the report is a freeze on the Plan 2 repayment threshold, which will be held at £29,385 from 2027 to 2030 instead of rising with inflation The Telegraph. That single decision means the average graduate will pay roughly £20,000 more over their career than they were led to expect when they signed up.
When students took out Plan 2 loans after 2012, promotional materials compared repayments to mobile phone bills or cinema tickets The Telegraph. Critics say that framing deliberately obscured how much the terms could change after signing. Crucially, borrowers were not clearly told that interest rates could rise or that repayment thresholds could be frozen by ministerial decision.
The committee also flags that mis-sold loans can hurt borrowers in a second, hidden way: mortgage affordability The Telegraph. Because student loan repayments reduce take-home pay, lenders factor them into affordability checks. Graduates can end up borrowing less for a home than a non-graduate with the same salary — a consequence that was never spelled out at the point of sale.
Graduates currently start repaying once they earn above £29,385 a year. That threshold was supposed to rise in line with wages or inflation each year The Telegraph. Instead, the government has frozen it at £29,385 until 2030. As wages grow, more of each graduate's salary falls above the threshold — pushing total lifetime repayments sharply higher.
Telegraph analysis puts the average extra cost at £20,000 per borrower over a career The Telegraph. With more than five million people on Plan 2 loans, the total additional burden runs into the billions. The Treasury Committee says reversing the freeze is the minimum step the government must take to address the mis-selling.
Unlike a bank loan or credit card, student loans are not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority The Telegraph. That means borrowers have limited legal recourse if terms change. The committee found that legal responsibility is also split awkwardly between the Department for Education and the Student Loans Company, leaving borrowers with nowhere clear to turn.
Commentators note this regulatory gap made mis-selling easier and remedies harder. One analyst argued that "the real mis-selling happened years before the loan agreement was signed" — pointing to a decades-long government push that sold university as the guaranteed path to prosperity, regardless of subject or institution The Telegraph.
The PPI scandal cost UK banks roughly £50 billion in compensation and remains the largest consumer mis-selling payout in British history The Telegraph. Some analysts warn that student loan redress, if it ever materialises, could exceed even that figure given the number of borrowers and the sums involved.
The government has not yet responded formally to the committee's findings. Critics say both Labour and Conservative administrations have repeatedly shifted costs onto younger generations by freezing or cutting thresholds rather than raising them The Telegraph. The committee is calling for transparency reforms and, at minimum, an immediate reversal of the 2027–2030 threshold freeze.
Publishers
11
Articles
27
Reach
38